Celebrity building spawnage

7 08 2008

This has been on my mind ever since the newest celebrity babies (the Jolie-Pitt/ Pitt-Jolie twins) joined our sorry world. Children as accessories, then. I’m thinking of the adoptees from third-world countries, in the main.* I’m also thinking of the likes of the following (from popbitch of all places).

We thought in the West the days of child slavery were, thankfully, over. Yet for many of the children of celebrities, a life born into slavery even from the first weeks of life, beckons.

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt waited barely three weeks before turning their twins into cash cows, putting them to work in front of the cameras for a multi-million pound fee. No matter that the fee was for a good cause, it was their children who had to earn it.

OK! magazine’s repost to Hello’s Brangelina exclusive this week was to bring out its big guns, in the shape of Jordan. Her daughter, Princess, got to celebrate her first birthday by helping her “uncle” Richard Desmond sell copies of his magazine. Jordan’s willingness to tell the world that her one-year old daughter never wears the same things twice and has a hundred pairs of shoes ensured OK! had as many column inches as Hello.

And in LA, the Beckhams’ continuing quest for even more fame saw David pick up an award at the Teen Choice Awards. And helping make sure he got the most coverage from the event, his three boys, in matching outfits (and haircuts just like their Dad, to ram the point home) also had to get up on stage and act up, like performing monkeys.

Surely as concerned, right-thinking citizens we should support the work of the anti-child slavery movement by shunning these harsh taskmasters?

Children there, building celebrity cred since 1998. And you all thought it was about shoes and handbags. Well it’s not. It’s about dressing your children up in finery that costs a small fortune, parading them in front of cameras looking cute and just that little bit precocious, and selling pictures of them to whoever bids the highest. It has a sort of pimping feel to it, frankly.

—-

* Imma gonna save them there little brown babies from sure peril for what would they do without us selfless and beautiful Americans! I don’t want an ugly one, mind. Or a fat one. Or one with eyes too far apart. Or one with too much hair. Or one with too little hair. Or one with strange eyes. Or one that’s too big. Or one that’s ugly. Have I mentioned that already?


Actions

Information

7 responses

7 08 2008
blue soup

I really hate this trend. Kids in the spotlight is a recipe for disaster. Look at Britney, Lynsey Lohan, Olsen twins, Geldolf kids, Macaulay Culkin… Their parents courted the glare of the media and now look at their wasted lives.

7 08 2008
tenderhooligan

Blue: It’s really disgusting. Where the hell is Culkin now anyway?

7 08 2008
blue soup

Not sure. He was listed as the second greatest kids star by VH1 in 2005 (behind Gary Coleman) and in 2007 he made a film called Sex and breakfast or something.

8 08 2008
tenderhooligan

Gary Coleman was first?! Oh my oh my!

12 08 2008
Victoria

we’re naming him Micah Aryeh which means “he who resembles God” and “Lion” in hebrew (which neither of us is Jewish, but we wanted biblical names this time around)

12 08 2008
Perpetual

I just find this endless cycle of celebrity based information mind numbing. But what despairs me is the thousands of people that lap it up all the time.

14 08 2008
tenderhooligan

Victoria, that is a lovely name. Will be be pronounced with a hard or soft C?

Perp, the hundreds and thousands of Heat addicts depresses me more than the celebrities, too.

Leave a comment